tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4754540220266106237.post3983260086368902140..comments2024-03-17T16:43:50.668-04:00Comments on Coverage Counsel: The First Department's New "I Didn't Know the Insurance Company Had Moved and My Attorney Didn't Spend Three-Tenths of a Second to Check" Excuse to Late Notice of SuitRoy A. Murahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06367888044845855898noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4754540220266106237.post-37609226228297589262009-10-26T06:20:15.092-04:002009-10-26T06:20:15.092-04:00I agree that the majority's decision is not ob...I agree that the majority's decision is not obviously correct. However,I don't see that it is obviously wrong, either.<br /><br />If insurers want to rely on late notification (with or without prejudice), then changing the notification address is a "no-no" in my humble opinion.<br /><br />I don't see why claimants should have the onus of checking addresses, whether it takes three seconds or three days.Fergus O'Rourkehttp://www.irish-lawyer.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4754540220266106237.post-73129207189676666072009-10-13T21:38:41.402-04:002009-10-13T21:38:41.402-04:00"However, paragraph 11 follows paragraph 9, w..."However, paragraph 11 follows paragraph 9, which provides that "[t]he following provisions . . . shall apply between the Company and the Insured but shall not prejudice the right of any person other than the Insured to recover hereunder."<br /><br />What a stupid provision!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com