Showing posts with label 24-Hour Notice to Police. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 24-Hour Notice to Police. Show all posts

Monday, October 12, 2009

Obtaining Written Report of Hit-and-Run Accident Not Always Required for Claim Against MVAIC

UM – HIT-AND-RUN ACCIDENT – CLAIM TO MVAIC – REPORT TO POLICE WITHIN 24 HOURS
Matter of Gurvich v. Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp.
(2nd Dept., decided 10/6/2009)

One precondition to securing uninsured motorists benefits from New York's Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (MVAIC) for injuries sustained in a hit-and-run accident is that the claimant "[r]eport the accident to the police, justice of the peace, a judge, or the Motor Vehicle Commissioner within twenty-four (24) hours after the accident[.]"

The New York courts liberally interpret what constitutes a satisfactory "report".  In this matter, the claimant commenced this special proceeding pursuant to Insurance Law § 5218(c) for leave to commence an action against MVAIC, which opposed the petition based on its assertion that the claimant had failed to report the hit-and-run accident to the police within 24 hours.  Kings Supreme rejected MVAIC's contention and granted the petition, leading to this appeal.

In AFFIRMING the order granting claimant's petition, the Second Department, held:
The Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation opposed the petition for leave to commence an action against it on the ground that the petitioner failed to report the subject accident to the police within 24 hours of the occurrence. However, the courts have "consistently afforded a very liberal interpretation to the notice requirement, accepting police contacts that fall far short of the operator's obtaining a written report" (Matter of Country Wide Ins. Co. [Russo], 201 AD2d 368, 370; see Canty v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp., 95 AD2d 509; Matter of Dixon v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp., 56 AD2d 650). Under the circumstances of this case, sufficient notice of the accident was timely given to the police.
The decision does not reveal what the "circumstances of this case" were that the motion and appellate courts found constituted sufficient notice of the accident to the police.  However, it appears the claimant had not obtained a written accident report from the police, something the courts rules was not fatal to her MVAIC claim. 

Sunday, June 8, 2008

Failure to Report Hit-and-Run Accident Within 24 Hours Precludes UM Coverage

UM – HIT-AND-RUN – 24-HOUR NOTICE TO POLICE OR DMV – CONDITION PRECEDENT TO COVERAGE
Sitbon v. Unitrin Preferred Ins. Co.
(2nd Dept., decided 6/3/2008)

Conditions precedent are ones that insureds must satisfy before the insurer owes coverage. Like paying the premium. Or giving timely notice of an accident. Or, in relation to uninsured motorists (UM) coverage claims stemming from hit-and-run accidents, reporting the accident to the police or other designated public official within 24 hours.

In this case, the insured was injured in a hit-and-run accident but did not report it to the police of Commissioner of DMV. Unitrin denied UM coverage, and the insured commenced this action. Unitrin moved unsuccessfully for summary judgment.

The Second Department REVERSED the lower court's order, finding Unitrin had made a prima facie showing of its entitlement to summary judgment by demonstrating, through the testimony of the plaintiff at an EUO documentation, that timely notice was not provided to either the police or the DMV Commissioner. In response, the plaintiff insured failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether he, or anyone on his behalf, provided timely notice, or any notice, of the accident as required.
The plaintiff did not oppose the motion for summary judgment with an affidavit or affirmation from the individual who prepared the original of the unsigned, partially completed, MV-104 form (Report of Motor Vehicle Accident) dated December 20, 2004, attesting to the filing of the report with the Commissioner and when it was filed. The plaintiff's sworn statements as to his knowledge of who prepared the report on his behalf are directly contradictory, with no explanation of the contradiction. Additionally, the Commissioner's form report of a motor vehicle accident specifically provides, in bold lettering, that an accident report is not considered complete and filed unless it is signed.