By way of an initial email daisy chain, to Larry Rogak for his Rogak Report, as augmented by the self-proclaimed gloriously hirsute Dave Gottlieb over at No-Fault Paradise, comes this report of this morning's oral argument of the East Acupuncture, P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co. case at the Appellate Division, Second Department.
At issue, of course, is whether the tolling provision of 11 NYCRR § 65-3.9(c), which refers only to "an applicant", also applies to assignees. The Appellate Term said it did. We'll see what the Appellate Division says in a few months.