
This is that new bill, S7854 Breslin, and it passed the state Senate by a vote of 58-0 on June 18, 2010. This bill's identical Assembly twin, A1116 Dinowicz, went to its Rules Committee on Monday, June 28th, and is expected to come out for a vote soon.
The 2010 version of the cut-back bill limits the exception to the intoxication exclusion to the payment of "necessary emergency health services rendered in a general hospital, as defined in [New York Public Health Law § 2801(10)] including ambulance services attendant thereto and related medical screening." As its 2008 predecessor did, it also provides that where a covered person is found to have violated V&T § 1192, the no-fault insurer may sue the covered person to recover the amount of first party benefits paid or payable for that person.
As one who has suspected that some hospitals play hide the toxicology report with no-fault insurers, I had to smile when reading this sentence in the sponsors' Statement in Support:
We'll see.By permitting reimbursement for necessary related medical screenings, such as blood alcohol and drug tests, more screenings will occur, underlying drug or alcohol problems will be more frequently identified and addressed, and ultimately fewer drug or alcohol-related injuries will occur.
If enacted, this bill will take effect 180 days after enactment and will apply to all policies that must afford no-fault insurance which are issued, renewed, modified, altered or amended on or after such date. Does anyone out there think New York no-fault insurers won't be paying for emergency services to intoxicated persons soon?
Eins, zwei, drei, zuffa!
No comments:
Post a Comment